| 1.0 |
Introduction
|
|
The Virgin Islands Department of Planning and
Natural Resource (DPNR) - Division of Environmental Protection (DEP), in
conjunction with the Nonpoint Source (NPS) Advisory Committee, is
seeking proposals for NPS pollution control and management
implementation projects. The
focus of the proposals will be on actions within a watershed or sub
watershed that will address NPS problems germane to that watershed. This focus on a geographic area
necessitates that implementation projects be based on cooperative
partnerships among all levels of government as well as other private and
public entities within the region for implementation and management
effectiveness.
|
| 2.0 |
Background and History of
the NPS Program and Watershed Management
|
|
DPNR-DEP has been
involved in NPS demonstration projects on a watershed basis over the
last few years. Beginning
with the last two funding cycles for FY 98 and FY 99, the project
areas were expanded to include all Category I Watersheds of the
Territory, as identified in the Unified Watershed Assessment Report. This funding (FY00) cycle is
looking to support projects throughout the 14 watershed management
areas that provide the most NPS environmental and economic benefit.
The Territory's NPS
Pollution Prevention Program operates pursuant to the 1987 Federal
Clean Water Act and the Coastal Zone Management Act Re-authorization
and Amendments of 1990 for the purpose of guiding the development
and implementation of NPS management efforts to the extent
consistent with existing statutory mandates and authority. These grants are funded
through section 319 (h) of the Federal Clean Water Act for projects
that implement best management practices (BMPs) or innovative
measures and other NPS controls in the 14 Category I watersheds as identified in the Draft
August 1998 Unified Watershed Assessment Report, and for projects
that provide education and outreach to critical audiences, both on a
watershed and sub watershed basis.
NPS management is a vital aspect of Virgin Islands efforts to
improve and protect water quality and water supply on a watershed
basis.
|
| 3.0 |
Purpose
|
|
The purpose of the
funding is 1) to encourage the building of watershed management
partnerships within a water management area, a watershed, or a sub
watershed; and 2) to implement management practices for NPS control
that have been proven to work either in the proposed project area or
in another area of similar environmental conditions. Unified Watershed Assessment Report, identifies the 14 water watershed management areas. The DEP is actively involved
with beginning watershed management plans for several of the 14
watershed management areas and expects the funded NPS projects to
eventually become coordinated with these efforts.
Based on the reasons
previously noted, this request for proposals is for implementation
projects including the implementation of BMPs or innovative measures
which have been previously proven to be effective. Proposals should fall into
one of the two categories listed below. These categories and the
proposal selection criteria have been developed in consultation with
the territory NPS Advisory Committee.
This Committee is composed of representatives from federal,
and local government agencies, and representatives from business and
industry, water purveyors and environmental interests.
|
| 4.0 |
Availability of Funds
|
|
At least $380,000 will
be available for Fiscal Year 2000.
All contracts will need to be executed after June 30, 2000,
when these funds become available.
Start date for each project implementation shall be upon
execution of the individual contract or the subsequent 9 months.
|
| 5.0 |
Management Measures
|
|
|
Management measures are
economically achievable measures to reduce NPS pollution. They reflect the greatest
degree of pollutant reduction achievable through the application of
the best available nonpoint source control practices, technologies,
processes, siting criteria, operating methods or other alternatives
(as defined in section 6217(g) of CZARA). Management measures are the
objectives used to achieve an environmental goal. Management measures should
result in delivery reduction of the NPS pollutant(s) to a ground or
surface water resource. For
the context of this Request for Proposal, management measures have
been broken down into two categories.
Category I: Management Practices.
Category 11: Education
and Outreach to Critical Audiences.
Implementing tools are
application methods that may be used to achieve a management
measure. These tools
may be applied in your proposal to achieve your goal and objectives.
Examples of
Implementing Tools for Management Measures are as follows:
Education, Guidance,
Training, Technical Assistance, Planning Assistance, Financial
Incentives, Financial Disincentives, Legal and Financial Liability,
Inspections, and Municipal Zoning.
|
| 6.0 |
Category Descriptions
|
|
Applicants may apply
for a grant under one of the following categories:
|
| 6.1 |
Category I - Management
Practices
|
|
Management practices
are employed to achieve a management measure. A management practice may be
physical (e.g. construction) or operational (e.g. operation and
maintenance). Management
practices such as source control are the first opportunity in any
NPS control effort. A
management practice may be a series of BMPs that in combination
achieve the goal of NPS control.
For example a filter strip may be effective for controlling
particulate and soluble pollutants where sedimentation is not
excessive, but for excessive sediment input the filter strip may be
used as pretreatment or supplemental treatment combined with
operation and maintenance to the system and education and outreach
to promote a behavioral change to those contributing to the source
of the NPS pollutant.
Examples of source
control techniques include, but are not linked to:
|
|
a. |
Reducing
or eliminating the introduction of pollutants to a land areas
through reduced nutrient and pesticide application.
|
|
b. |
Implementing
soil erosion measures to prevent pollutants from leaving the site
during land-disturbance activities (Note: activities required by the
Department or a Soil Conservation District through regulatory
programs are not eligible for funding).
|
|
c. |
Protecting
riparian habitat and other sensitive areas through protection and
preservation of riparian zones and highly erosive slopes, etc.
|
|
d. |
Maintenance
of pervious surfaces to protect natural hydrology.
|
|
e. |
Watershed
management plans, ordinances, and farm management plans, etc.
|
|
f. |
Setback
standards for buffer zones and limits on impervious surface areas,
etc.
|
|
For Category I,
applicants will need to identify the watershed management area, or a
watershed/subwatershed in accordance with the unified Watershed
Assessment Report that pertains to their proposal. The document identifies the
14 watershed management areas.
The project proposal
may address the entire water region, a specific watershed management
area(s), a watershed(s) within the management area, or a smaller
subwatershed(s). The
purpose of Category I is to implement BMPs which have been proven to
work whether tested in your project area or in areas of similar
environmental conditions elsewhere.
Proposals for Category I must identify the impairment to the
watershed/subwatershed and how the project will help mitigate or
reduce this impairment or proactively address the prevention of
future NPS impairment to the watershed/subwatershed. A single community seeking a
grant will need to think about their role in reducing or preventing
NPS pollution within the broader context of a watershed. The purpose is to encourage
partnerships among cooperating entities that all have a
"stake" in the environmental improvement of the watershed. Funding for these
projects are encouraged to piggyback with other funding sources or
be used to complete an ongoing project. Applicants may not submit
the same proposal for multiple watersheds or for both categories. Applicants submitting a
project under Category I are encouraged to incorporate an
information and education component to their project. Please describe the target
audience and how they will
participate. Describe
techniques employed to gain local government and community support. Describe how the activity
coordinates with, enhances or supplements other education/outreach
activities in the area.
|
| 6.2 |
Category II - Education
and Outreach to Critical Audiences
|
|
Education and Outreach
to a Critical Audience are another means to reduce NPS pollution. The critical audience
participation is critical to meet management measure objectives. The purpose of this category
is to provide mechanisms that teach people to implement BMPs or NPS
Management Programs. Public
education and outreach has long been recognized as an essential tool
for NPS management and control.
Proposals should be comprehensive in the design and
implementation approach. In
this category the applicant may choose a critical audience (such as
developers) which may not lend itself to a specific watershed. The applicant should explain how educating this critical
audience will help mitigate NPS pollution. Issues to be considered
include:
|
|
a. |
Identify and target a
critical audience(s) within a water region, a watershed management
area, or a watershed in accordance with the Unified Watershed
Assessment Report or a more territory wide critical audience, e.g.,
environmental commissions, local government officials, transient
summer residents in coastal watersheds, engineers, landscape
architects, and homeowners, etc.
|
|
b. |
Coordinate
with existing education and outreach initiatives within the region
and/or expand upon an existing successful program. The success of the initial
program must be documented.
|
|
c. |
Identify partners for the
project, including a) others who have a stake in the environmental
improvement or well being of the watershed and b) those who can
contribute to the project in either cash or in-kind contributions.
|
|
Applicants in this
category may submit a proposal to be implemented statewide or they
may choose to conduct their project within a specific watershed,
sub-watershed or water region.
|
| 7.0 |
NPS Grant Program Specifications
|
| 7.1 |
Eligibility
|
|
Entities which may
apply for funding include:
Local
comprehensive planning or health organizations and coalitions
(formal or informal) of and/or local environmental
commissions; watershed and water resource associations; nonprofit
organizations 501(c)(3),
including but not limited to, the following:
|
|
a. |
County planning
departments, health departments or boards;
|
|
b. |
Designated Water Quality Management Program
agencies;
|
|
c. |
V.I. and regional entities entirely within the
Virgin Islands;
|
|
d. |
V.I. government agencies, universities and
colleges;
|
|
e. |
Federal government;
|
|
f. |
Interstate agencies of which Virgin Islands is
a member;
|
|
g. |
Intrastate regional entities.
|
| 7.2 |
Qualifications Needed by
an Applicant to be Considered for Funding
Applicants
Must:
|
|
a. |
Have
the staff and resources with the capability, expertise, and
environmental experience to perform the proposed work; and
|
|
b. |
Have the ability and
authority to implement the proposed project; and
|
|
c. |
Demonstrate the ability to establish and
maintain partnerships for project implementation; and
|
|
d. |
Provide matching funds in an
amount equivalent to at least 20 percent of the total project amount
(i.e., at most a 4:1 ratio between NPS grant and matching funds). The matching funds may
consist of cash, in-kind services, or a combination of both.
|
| 7.3 |
Ineligible
Activities
Funds will not be
awarded for the following activities:
|
|
a. |
Activities currently
required by Department regulation.
Costs associated with compliance of permits or enforcement
orders issued by the Department or a Soil Conservation District. Costs required as a result
of a pre-existing permit are ineligible; however, the fee cost of
the permit(s) to perform the project is eligible.
|
|
b. |
Costs for legal representation in a court of
law.
|
|
c. |
Costs associated with the purchase of land or
major capital improvements and computer hardware.
|
|
d. |
Pond dredging, weed
harvesting, wier maintenance or other activities beyond the scope of
controlling the input of NPS pollutants.
|
|
e. |
Costs for BMP
implementation on private lands, except for demonstration projects
for which a mandatory cash cost-share of 25% is required. This cost share is for that
part of the total project costs related to the implementation on
private lands. However,
it can be used as part of the overall 20% match for the total
project cost.
|
|
f. |
Other activities ineligible based on current
EPA Guidance for Section 319 (h) grants.
|
| 8.0 |
Public Meetings
Four Public Meetings
will be held to provide potential applicants with information and to
answer questions regarding the proposal process. Applicants are encouraged to
come prepared to discuss potential projects eligible for funding.
VIDPNR staff and the NPS Advisor Community will entertain questions
and provide comments on proposal ideas.
|
|
| Date |
Location |
Time |
 |
| 3/23/00 |
Florence A. Williams Public
Library, St. Croix |
6:00PM |
3/22/00
|
Curriculum Center, St. Thomas
|
11:00AM
|
|
| 9.0 |
Pre-Proposal Format and
Requirements
General Requirements for
Submitting a Pre-proposal:
|
|
a. |
Cover
Page - The cover page must contain: the title of the project, the
project category, which one of the 14 watersheds the project falls
under, the applicant's name, complete address, phone number, contact
person (fax number and e-mail address are optional), approximate
amount of money to be requested, and approximate amount of match.
|
|
b. |
Number of Pages - The
pre-proposal may not exceed 5 pages total, not including the cover
page, letters of resource commitment and budget page.
|
|
c. |
Typeset - The applicant
should use 12 point type in standard type such as Times NewRoman.
|
|
d. |
Number of Copies - Three
copies of the pre-proposal must be submitted by the deadline.
|
|
e. |
Budget Page.
|
|
f. |
Letters of Resource
Commitment - one page letter from all major project partners
outlining their commitment toward the matching funds requirement. This is a letter and may be
revised when submitting the complete proposal.
|
|
g. |
All pre-proposals must
address the following:
|
|
|
1) |
Identify the watershed/subwatershed
the project area will involve for Category I proposals.The
identified watershed may be as large as one of the 14 watershed
management areas identified in the Unified Watershed Assessment
Report, or a hydrological complete subwatershed within one of the 14
watersheds. USGS
hydrologic units may be used (particularly when addressing projects
in smaller areas, such as those codes of eleven or fourteen digits). Category II proposals should
also identify the watershed/subwatershed their project area will
cover unless their project is Island wide.
|
|
|
2) |
Select one of the two categories for which the proposal
is being submitted.
|
|
|
3) |
Provide a Statement of Need: What is the NPS problem,
opportunity or need in your project area. Explain the extent of the
NPS problem and how and why your project will address the issue. For Category II project
explain how and why the target audience was selected to address a
specific NPS issue.
|
|
|
4) |
State the goal and objective
of the project. The
objectives are implemented through specific project tasks. Identify
the major tasks needed to implement the project.
|
|
|
5) |
For each task, identify all partnerships and clearly
indicate their role in achieving the objective. It is recommended
that partnerships include entities from more than just one
municipality.
|
|
|
6) |
Budget with figures
associated with objectives (and if possible a task break down with
cost and partner's contribution).
|
|
|
7) |
Attach letters of resource
commitment from the major partners and project participants (as many
of your identified partners as possible at this time). The letters from the
partners should state what they are contributing to the project
(time, money and effort) and should be reflected in the tasks
section as discussed in Number 5.
NOTE: Generic letters of support from nonproject partners,
although important to the applicant do not contribute to the execution and completion of
the project in the long run and therefore, are discouraged from the
pre-proposal process.
|
|
Pre-proposals must
be delivered to DPNR-DEP or postmarked by April 30, 2000.
Organizations may submit
more than one pre-proposal, but are discouraged from submitting the
same pre-proposal for different watersheds/subwatersheds. Pre-proposals will be reviewed by a team in the VIDPNR, EPA
and the NPS Advisory Committe.
The purpose of this review is to identify the most beneficial
concepts, identify ways to improve the benefits of those projects,
match potential partners with each other (as appropriate) and to
save the applicants' time. Pre-proposals
that pass this review process will be notified to proceed with
submission of a complete proposal.
Those applicants not selected will be notified and provided
with recommendations on how to improve their proposals for the
future.
|