Submitted by the Division of Environmental Protection
Department of Planning and Natural Resources
Government of the Virgin Islands
of the United States
LIST OF TABLES *
LIST OF FIGURES *
PART I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY *
A. Purpose *
B. Overview of Water Quality Conditions and Trends *
C. Program Initiatives *
D. Summary of Classified Uses *
E. Highlights of the Rest of this Report *
PART II: BACKGROUND *
A. Resource Overview *
B. Classifications, Total Waters and Applicable Standards *
C. Water Pollution Control Program *
PART III: SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT *
A. Current Surface Water Monitoring Program *
B. Assessment Methodology and Summary Data *
C. Estuary and Coastal Assessment *
D. Wetlands Assessment *
E. Public Health/Aquatic Life Concerns *
PART IV: GROUND WATER ASSESSMENT *
A. Overview of Virgin Islands Ground Water Protection Programs *
B. Overview of Ground Water Contamination Sources *
C. Summary of Ground Water Quality *
D. Summary of Ground Water-Surface Water Interactions *
Attachment I: Unified Watershed Assessment: Category 1 Watersheds *
Attachment II: Areas of Particular Concern *
Attachment III *
Endnotes *
Table II.A.1 Characteristics of Virgin Islands Watersheds and Islands *
Table II A. 1 Watersheds Listed in the Unified Watershed Assessment *
Table II.A.2 Alignment of 14-Digit HUs and Watersheds *
Table II.A.3 Waterbodies, Segments, Coastal Shoreline Miles and Monitoring Sites *
Table II.B.1 Summary of Pollutant Levels of VI Water Quality Standards: *
Table II.B.2 Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use and Island *
Table II.B.2.a Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use on St. Croix *
Table II.B.3.a Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use on St. Thomas *
Table II.B.4.a Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use on St. John *
Table II.C.1 Federal Reports of VI Pollution Discharge Permits, 1996-97 *
Table II.C.2 Summary of TPDES Activities, 1996 and 1997 *
Table II.C.3 Supplementary POTW Inspections: TPDES, 1996 and 1997 *
Table II.C.4 Summary of TPDES Enforcement Activities, FY 1996 and FY 1997 *
Table III.A.1 142 Virgin Islands "Boat" Monitoring Sites *
Table III.A.2 65 Virgin Islands Beach Monitoring Sites *
Table III.B.1 Virgin Islands Hydrologic Units and Acreage *
Table III.B.2 Waterbodies, Segments, Coast Lengths and Monitoring Sites *
Table III.B.3 Summary of 1998 VI List of Impaired [303(d)] Waters *
Table III.C.1.a Waterbodies, Segments, Coast Lengths and Designated Uses *
Table III.C.1.b Summary of Designated Uses by Estimated Coast Lengths *
Table III.C.2 Summary of Fully, Partially and Non-supporting Coastal Waters *
Table III.C.3 Sources of Use Impairment by Sampling Site 1996 to 1997. *
Table III.D.1 Wetlands Classifications *
Table: Attachment III.A St. Croix Monitoring Results 1996 and 1997 *
Table: Attachment III.B St. Thomas-St. John Monitoring Results 1996 and 1997 *
Assessment & Source Codes for Attachment Tables III.A and III.B *
Figure II.A.1 St. Croix Waterbodies *
Figure II.A.2 St. Thomas Waterbodies *
Figure II.A.3 St. John Waterbodies *
Figure II.B.2 St. Croix Coastal Waters Classified by Designated Use *
Figure II.B.3 St. Thomas Coastal Waters Classified by Class *
Figure II.B.4 St. John Coastal Waters Classified by Class *
Figure III.A.1: St. Croix Waters Boat Monitoring Network *
Figure III.A.2: St. Thomas Waters Boat Monitoring Network *
Figure III.A.3: St. John Waters Boat Monitoring Network *
Figure III.B.1 Data Relationships for Waterbodies, Segments and Assessment Information *
Figure III.C.2.a St. Croix: Fully, Partially and
Non-supporting Coastal
Waters *
Figure III.C.2.b St. Thomas: Fully, Partially and
Nonsupporting Coastal
Waters *
Figure III.C.2c St. John: Fully, Partially and
Nonsupporting Coastal
Waters *
The 1998 United States Virgin Islands Water Quality Assessment report was prepared on behalf of the Department of Planning and Natural Resources, Division of Environmental Protection (DPNR/DEP) and is intended to satisfy abbreviated reporting requirements under section 305(b) of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA), reference to the Territorial 1996 Report. This report provides an assessment of the water quality conditions of the Virgin Island’s surface and ground water resources for the period covering fiscal years 1996 and 1997 (October 1, 1995 through September 30, 1997), in addition to the conditions discussed in the 1996 Water Quality Assessment Report.
Water quality in the US Virgin Islands is generally good but declining due to an increase in point and non-point source discharges into the marine environment. Sources such as direct discharges, uncontrolled run-off and vessel wastes increase stresses on Virgin Islands (VI) waters. The lack of public awareness about the importance of the USVI waters contributes to the degradation of the water quality.
1. Surface Water
Non-point source pollution is the major source of surface water contamination in the Virgin Islands. Non-point source pollution can be attributed to several causes such as:
The discharging of wastes overboard directly into the sea by boat owners and the difficulty in regulating such activity also contributes to non-point source pollution problems seen in the Virgin Islands. Point Source Pollution can be attributed to a failing and overloaded municipal sewage system. Poor preventive maintenance practices due to lack of funding within the Department of Public Works, and negligence result in a pattern of frequent "bypasses" that empty sewage directly into the waters of the Virgin Islands.
2. Ground Water
The contamination of groundwater in the Virgin Islands is attributed to:
Other sources of contamination include the intrusion of salt water caused by the over-pumping of the aquifers, the invasion of volatile organic compounds (VOC's) contamination from leaking underground storage tanks, and the indiscriminate discharging of waste oil onto the surface of the ground.
Under the provisions of the Federal and Local Water Pollution Control Act, the Virgin Islands Water Pollution Control (WPC) Program is mandated to conserve, protect, preserve, and improve the quality of water for public use, and the propagation of wildlife, fish and aquatic life for the USVI. Involved in the preservation of water quality will be the assurance that all projects are in compliance with the Water Quality Standards as set forth in the Virgin Islands Environmental Laws and Regulations.
In addition, the program reporting period (FY 1996 and FY 1997) saw water quality management activities in the Virgin Islands being planned for integration for both management and reporting purposes with the Unified Watershed Assessment process of the Clean Water Action Plan. This Virgin Islands Water Quality Assessment presents water quality assessment information in a format that preserves the Virgin Islands long-term data series by using the same water quality monitoring sites. This report also indicates how this data can be summarized at a level that is compatible for both Water Quality Assessment, and the Unified Watershed Assessment process.
VI waters are classified into three (3) groups based on designated uses: Class A, B. and C:
Class A waters are for the preservation of natural phenomena requiring special conditions with existing natural conditions that shall not be changed. Class A water standards are the most stringent of the three (3) classes because of its pristine or near-pristine state.
Class B and C waters are for the propagation of desirable species of marine life and for primary contact recreation.
Class C waters have less stringent water quality standards than Class B.
Detailed specifications for these classes are presented in Part II, Section B, below.
All waters of the Virgin Islands are designated for fish consumption, aquatic life support, swimming, and secondary contact uses pursuant to the Virgin Islands Water Quality Standard, Title 12, Chapter 7, §186-1 of the Virgin Islands Rules and Regulations (VIRR).
The territory of the United States Virgin Islands comprises 3 major islands: St. Croix, St. John, and St. Thomas. Additionally, Damman and Nellis (1992) documented 57 smaller islands and cays in A Natural History Atlas to the Cays of the US Virgin Islands. Taken together, the territory encompasses a total land area of about 135 square miles or 110,000 acres (Table II.A.1) characterized by central mountain ranges and relatively small coastal plains. Peak elevations are 1,165 feet on St. Croix (Mount Eagle), 1,550 feet on St. Thomas, (Crown Mountain) and 1,297 feet on St. John (Bordeaux Mountain). The islands are generally only 2 to 6 miles wide, with no land location far from the coastal waters. All data in this report focus on the main islands of St. Croix, St. John, and St. Thomas (although several enclosed bays within the main islands' watersheds include offshore islands and cays).
The recent (September, 1998) return of Water Island to the control of the Government of the US Virgin Islands, after 50-some years of direct federal administration (first as a fort by the Department of the Army during the Second World War, and later as the responsibility of the US Department of the Interior) raises the question of whether this areas should be treated as a fourth island. Because the area is small (less than 600 acres or 1 square mile), and because the island is practically within St. Thomas Harbor, for the purposes of the Water Quality Assessment, Water Island will be treated as another offshore cay or small inhabited island, such as Hassel Island or Great St. James.
The offshore cays and small islands are an inherent piece of the natural heritage of the Virgin Islands. Additionally, as an economic asset, these offshore sites could be included within a broad ecotourism program for the territory. Many government-owned cays have already been established as wildlife reserves pursuant to Title 12 94(b)(2) VI Rules and Regulations. A number are important seabird nesting sites, and several are important roosting areas. The surrounding waters of most of the cays and islands teem with marine life, providing food for seabirds and for the fish and shellfish sought by commercial and recreational fishermen. They are also critical as dive sites targeted by the local diving industry.
There are no large freshwater lakes or ponds, and no perennial streams on any of the islands; and intermittent streams can only be seen after heavy rainfall. The absence of large freshwater resources and perennial streams means that guts (watercourses) form the basis for watershed management in the territory.
This Water Quality Assessment is based on the United State Geological Survey (USGS) 8- digit Hydrologic Units for the US Virgin Islands, which designate two Virgin Islands watersheds: one for St. Croix, and one for the combined islands of St. Thomas-St. John.
In addition, this Water Quality Assessment also uses preliminary, draft 11- and 14-digit Hydrologic Unit definitions, in the process of being finalized by the US Geological Service of the US Department of Interior and the Natural Resources Conservation Service of the US Department of Agriculture, to define territorial Waterbodies. Within these fourteen draft waterbodies (seven on St. Croix, four on St. Thomas, and three on St. John), the Virgin Islands also wishes to define waterbody Segments, which correspond to coastal elements of watersheds used by and undergoing further definition in the Virgin Islands Unified Watershed Assessment program.
Table II.A.1 Characteristics of Virgin Islands Watersheds and Islands
|
Official Watersheds |
St. Croix |
St. Thomas-St. John |
| |
|
TOPICS/Islands |
St. Croix |
St Thomas |
St John |
TOTAL |
|
Population |
51,389 |
54,259 |
4,014 |
109,661 |
|
Land Area (square miles) |
84 |
32 |
20 |
136 |
|
Land Area (acres) |
53,499 |
17,489 |
12,323 |
83,311 |
|
Tidal/sub-tidal Wetlands (square miles) |
2.5 |
2.4 |
1.1 |
5.9 |
|
Coastal Shoreline |
70.3 |
52.8 |
49.7 |
172.8 |
|
Embayments (square miles) |
1.5 |
0.9 |
0.1 |
3.0 |



The [preliminary, draft] 14-digit Hydrologic Unit delineations are to be integrated with the list of watersheds used for the analysis in the Unified Watershed Assessment: See Part III below.
Table II A. 1 Watersheds Listed in the Unified Watershed Assessment
The watersheds on St. Croix, St. Thomas and St. John are as follows:
St. Croix
Label Watersheds Acres
A. Northside 2,258
B. Baron Bluff 1,262
C. Salt River Bay 3,510
D. Princess 2,182
E. Christiansted 1,225
F. Altoona Lagoon 1,239
G. Southgate 1,597
H. Solitude 1,691
I. Teagues Bay 1,061
J. Turner Hole 711
K. Madam Carty 1,128
L. Great Pond Bay 2,007
M. Laprey Valley 1,853
N. Bugby Hole 998
0. Cane Garden Bay 1,527
P. Hovic-Vialco 7,642
Q. Bethlehem 6,689
R. Airport 1,654
S. Diamond 2,577
T. Long Point Bay 2,044
U. Sandy Point 2,735
V. La Grange 3,137
W. Prosperity 967
X. Creque Dam 703
Y. Butler Bay 918
Z. Rams Bay 757
Total St. Croix Acres 54,072
St. Thomas Watersheds
A. Botany Point 945
B. Santa Maria Bay 867
C. Dorothea Bay 1,861
D. Magens Bay 1,210
E. Mandahl Bay 1,883
F. Smith Bay 902
G. Redhook Bay 850
H. Benner Bay 3,666
I. Frenchman Bay 1,137
J. St. Thomas Harbour 2,696
K. Harry S. Truman Airport 1,524
(now Cyril E. King)
L. Preseverance Bay 704
M. Fortuna Bay 707
Total St. Thomas 18,952
St. John Watersheds
N. Hawksnest 1,305
0. Maho Bay 1,116
P. Leinster Bay 795
Q. Minnebeck Bay 629
R. Coral Bay 3,003
S. Great Lameshur Bay 1,545
T. Genti (Reef) Bay 1,208
U. Fish Bay 1,503
V. Rendezvous Bay 416
W. Great Cruz Bay 529
St. John Total Acres 12,049
These watersheds align closely with the larger 14-digit Hydrologic Units drafted by the USGS and the NRCS. In the current biennial planning period (FY 1998 and FY 1999), the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources will provide a detailed integration and overlay of these two systems.
The preliminary alignment is as follows:
Table II.A.2 Alignment of 14-Digit HUs and Watersheds
|
Hydrologic Unit Codes |
||||
|
8-Digit |
11-Digit |
14-Digit |
Name |
Acres |
|
21020002 |
St. Croix Watershed |
54,072 | ||
|
21020002010 |
North St. Croix |
22,507 | ||
|
21020002010010 |
Northwest St. Croix |
6,482 | ||
|
V. La Grange |
3,137 | |||
|
W. Prosperity |
967 | |||
|
X. Creque Dam |
703 | |||
|
Y. Butler Bay |
918 | |||
|
Z. Rams Bay |
757 | |||
|
21020002010020 |
Northcentral St. Croix |
7,030 | ||
|
A. Northside |
2,258 | |||
|
B. Baron Bluff |
1,262 | |||
|
C. Salt River Bay |
3,510 | |||
|
21020002010030 |
Northeast St. Croix |
8,995 | ||
|
D. Princess |
2,182 | |||
|
E. Christiansted |
1,225 | |||
|
F. Altoona Lagoon |
1,239 | |||
|
G. Southgate |
1,597 | |||
|
H. Solitude |
1,691 | |||
|
I. Tagues Bay |
1,061 | |||
|
Acres | ||||
|
21020002020 |
South St. Croix |
31,565 | ||
|
21020002020010 |
Southeast St. Croix |
8,224 | ||
|
J. Turner Hole |
711 | |||
|
K. Madam Carty |
1,128 | |||
|
L.. Great Pond Bay |
2,007 | |||
|
M. Laprey Valley |
1,853 | |||
|
N. Bugby Hole |
998 | |||
|
0. Cane Garden Bay |
1,527 | |||
|
21020002020020 |
Southports St. Croix |
7,642 | ||
|
P. Hovic-Vialco |
7,642 | |||
|
21020002020030 |
Airport St. Croix |
8,343 | ||
|
Q. Bethlehem |
6,689 | |||
|
R.Airport |
1,654 | |||
|
21020002020040 |
Southwest St. Croix |
7,356 | ||
|
S. Diamond |
2,577 | |||
|
T. Long Point Bay |
2,044 | |||
|
U. Sandy Point |
2,735 | |||
|
21020001 |
St. Thomas- |
| ||
|
21020001010 |
St. Thomas |
18,952 | ||
|
21020001010010 |
Northwest St. Thomas |
4883 | ||
|
A. Botany Point |
945 | |||
|
B. Santa Maria Bay |
867 | |||
|
C. Dorothea Bay |
1,861 | |||
|
D. Magens Bay |
1,210 | |||
|
21020001010020 |
Northeast St. Thomas |
3,635 | ||
|
E. Mandal Bay |
1,883 | |||
|
F. Smith Bay |
902 | |||
|
G. Redhook Bay |
850 | |||
|
21020001010030 |
Southeast St. Thomas |
4,803 | ||
|
H. Benner Bay |
3,666 | |||
|
I. Frenchman Bay |
1,137 | |||
|
21020001010040 |
Southwest St. Thomas |
5,631 | ||
|
J. St. Thomas Habour |
2,696 | |||
|
K. Cyril E King Airport |
1,524 | |||
|
L. Preseverance Bay |
704 | |||
|
M. Fortuna Bay |
707 | |||
|
Acres | ||||
|
21020001020 |
St. John |
12,049 | ||
|
21020001020010 |
North St. John |
3,845 | ||
|
N. Hawksnest |
1,305 | |||
|
0. Maho Bay |
1,116 | |||
|
P. Leinster Bay |
795 | |||
|
Q. Minnebeck Bay |
629 | |||
|
21020001020020 |
Southeast St. John |
4,548 | ||
|
R. Coral Bay |
3,003 | |||
|
S. Great Lameshur Bay |
1,545 | |||
|
21020001020030 |
Southwest St. John |
3,656 | ||
|
T. Genti (Reef) Bay |
1,208 | |||
|
U. Fish Bay |
1,503 | |||
|
V. Rendezvous Bay |
416 | |||
|
W. Great Cruz Bay |
529 | |||
Table II.A.3 Waterbodies, Segments, Coastal Shoreline Miles and Monitoring Sites
Finally, these two systems are displayed with an indication of the length of coastal shoreline associated with each Waterbody, and the number of current in-water (WQ or "boat" sites) and beach water quality monitoring sites established by the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources.
|
Waterbodies |
(WB 14-digit HU Codes) |
Approximate Length (est.) |
WQ Sites |
Beach Sites | ||
|
VIRGIN ISLANDS TOTAL |
172.8 |
140 |
65 | |||
|
St. Croix |
70.3 |
59 |
32 | |||
|
North St. Croix |
33.4 |
38 |
na | |||
|
Northwest St. Croix |
(21020002010010) |
8.9 |
3 |
|||
|
V. La Grange |
tbd |
|||||
|
W. Prosperity |
tbd |
|||||
|
X. Creque Dam |
tbd |
|||||
|
Y. Butler Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Z. Rams Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Northcentral St. Croix |
(21020002010020) |
9.5 |
12 |
|||
|
A. Northside |
tbd |
|||||
|
B. Baron Bluff |
tbd |
|||||
|
C. Salt River Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Northeast St. Croix |
(21020002010030) |
15.0 |
23 |
|||
|
D. Princess |
tbd |
|||||
|
E. Christiansted |
tbd |
|||||
|
F. Altoona Lagoon |
tbd |
|||||
|
G. Southgate |
tbd |
|||||
|
H. Solitude |
tbd |
|||||
|
I. Tagues Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Miles |
Sites |
Sites | ||||
|
South St. Croix |
36.9 |
21 |
na | |||
|
Southeast St. Croix |
(21020002020010) |
15.3 |
6 |
|||
|
J. Turner Hole |
tbd |
|||||
|
K. Madam Carty |
tbd |
|||||
|
L.. Great Pond Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
M. Laprey Valley |
tbd |
|||||
|
N. Bugby Hole |
tbd |
|||||
|
0. Cane Garden Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Southports St. Croix |
(21020002020020) |
8.1 |
9 |
|||
|
P. Hovic-Vialco |
tbd |
|||||
|
Airport St. Croix |
21020002020030 |
2.5 |
3 |
|||
|
Q. Bethlehem |
tbd |
|||||
|
R.Airport |
tbd |
|||||
|
Southwest St. Croix |
(21020002020040) |
11.0 |
3 |
|||
|
S. Diamond |
tbd |
|||||
|
T. Long Point Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
U. Sandy Point |
tbd |
|||||
|
St. Thomas-St. John |
102.5 |
81 |
33 | |||
|
St. Thomas |
52.8 |
62 |
23 | |||
|
Northwest St. Thomas |
(21020001010010) |
11.5 |
8 |
5 | ||
|
Botany Point |
tbd |
|||||
|
Santa Maria Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Dorothea Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Magens Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Northeast St. Thomas |
(21020001010020) |
13.5 |
13 |
8 | ||
|
Mandal Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Smith Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Redhook Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Southeast St. Thomas |
(21020001010030) |
11.0 |
16 |
5 | ||
|
Benner Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Frenchman Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Southwest St. Thomas |
(21020001010040) |
16.8 |
25 |
5 | ||
|
St. Thomas Harbor |
tbd |
|||||
|
Cyril E. King Airport (ex-HST) |
tbd |
|||||
|
Preseverance Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Fortuna Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
St. John |
49.7 |
19 |
10 | |||
|
North St. John |
(21020001020010) |
20.0 |
5 |
6 | ||
|
N. Hawksnest |
tbd |
|||||
|
0. Maho Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
P. Leinster Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Q. Minnebeck Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Southeast St. John |
(21020001020020) |
19.7 |
4 |
1 | ||
|
R. Coral Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
S. Great Lameshur Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
Southwest St. John |
(21020001020030) |
10.0 |
10 |
3 | ||
|
T. Genti Reef) Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
U. Fish Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
V. Rendezvous Bay |
tbd |
|||||
|
W.Great Cruz Bay |
tbd |
|||||
Tbd
As indicated previously, detailed mapping, determination of the length of coast or area of the segments and waterbodies in this list are tasks being undertaken by Departmental staff and contractors during the current 305(b) reporting period, although planning for these issues began during the previous period (subject to this report).The information on Water Quality Criteria by Classification and pollutant are summarized in Table II. B.1, below, which closely follows the wording of Virgin Islands Rules and Regulations.
Boundaries of Class A Waters:
Preservation of natural phenomena requiring special conditions, such as the natural Barrier Reef at Buck Island, St. Croix (defined within 0.5 miles of the boundaries of Buck Island’s National Barrier Reef) and the Under Water Trail at Trunk Bay, St. John. Existing natural conditions shall not be changed.
Boundaries of Class B Waters:
Propagation of desirable species of marine life and for primary contact recreation (swimming, water skiing, etc.) The Water Quality Criteria as defined by VIR&R Title 12, Chapter 7, Section 186-3(b)(1-11) are:
Boundaries of Class B waters defined as all other coastal waters not classified Class "A" or Class "C". In addition, those Class "B" waters covered by color and turbidity criteria in Section 186-3(b)(11) [T. 12, Ch. 7] include:
Boundaries of Class C Waters:
Propagation of desirable species of marine life and primary contact recreation (swimming, water skiing, etc.). The Water Quality Criteria as defined by VIR&R Title 12, Chapter 7, Section 186-4(b)(1-6) are:
Legal limits of Class C Waters defined as:
Table II.B.1 Summary of Pollutant Levels of Virgin Islands Water Quality Standards:
|
Pollutant |
Class B |
Class C |
|
Dissolved Oxygen |
Not less than 5.5 mg/l from other than natural sources |
Not less than 5.0 mg/l |
|
PH |
<8.3 Tolerable Limit>7.0 |
<8.5 Tolerable Limit>6.7 |
|
Temperature |
Less than 90° Fahrenheit |
Same as Class B |
|
Bacteria |
Not to exceed 70 fecal coliforms per 100 ml by MF or MPN count |
Not to exceed 200 fecal coliforms per 100 ml by MF or MPN count |
|
Dissolved Gas |
Not to exceed 110% of existing atmospheric pressure |
Same as Class B |
|
Phosphorus |
Not to exceed 50 mg/l in any coastal waters |
Same as Class B |
|
Suspended , colloidal or settleable solids |
None from waste water which would cause deposition or be otherwise deleterious. |
Same as Class B |
|
Oil and Floating substances |
No residue attributable to waste water. No visible film; no globules of grease |
Same as Class B |
|
Radioactivity |
Gross Beta: 1000 picocuries per liter, in the absence of Sr 90 and alpha emittersRadium-226: 3 picocuries per liter Strontium-90: 10 picocuries per liter |
Same as Class B |
|
Taste and Odor |
None in amounts to interfere with use for primary contact recreation, potable water supply or to render undesirable taste or odor to edible aquatic life |
Same as Class B |
|
Color and Turbidity |
|
Same as Class B, but no NTU standard in Rules and Regulations |
There have been no changes to these Water Quality Rules and Regulations in this reporting period
Table II.B.2 Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use and Island
|
|
St. Croix |
St. Thomas |
St. John |
Total |
|
Class A |
2.5 |
0.0 |
1.0 |
3.5 |
|
Class B |
55.3 |
45.5 |
48.7 |
149.5 |
|
Class C |
12.5 |
7.3 |
0.0 |
19.8 |
|
Total |
70.3 |
52.8 |
49.7 |
172.8 |
Figure II.B.2 St. Croix Coastal Waters Classified by Designated Use

Table II.B.2.a Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use on St. Croix
Coastal Shorelines for Classes for St. Croix are estimated as follows:
|
Class |
Miles |
Site or calculation |
|
Class A |
2.5 miles |
Buck Island |
|
Class B |
55.3 miles |
by subtraction (per VI R&R) |
|
Class C |
3.0 miles |
Christiansted Harbor Shoreline |
|
|
4.0 miles |
Hess Oil Terminal |
|
|
4.1 miles |
Krauss Lagoon (Alumina Company Docks) |
|
|
1.4 Miles |
Frederiksted Shoreline |

Table II.B.3.a Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use on St. Thomas
Coastal Shorelines for Classes for St. Thomas are estimated as follows:
|
Class |
Miles |
Site or calculation |
|
Class A |
-- miles |
|
|
Class B |
45.5 miles |
by subtraction (per VI R&R) |
|
Class C |
4.0 miles |
St. Thomas Harbor |
|
|
1.8 miles |
Crown Bay |
|
|
1.5 miles |
Krum Bay Shore |

Table II.B.4.a Miles of Coastal Shorelines by Class of Use on St. John
Designated uses for St. John are estimated as follows:
|
Class |
Miles |
Site or calculation |
|
Class A |
1.0 miles |
Trunk Bay |
|
Class B |
48.7 miles |
by subtraction (per VI R&R) |
|
Class C |
--- miles |
|
Water quality standards for each class of designated use are provided in Table II.B.2. While the water quality standards are scheduled to be reviewed and updated every three years for the inclusion of additional needed criteria if necessary, this task has not been undertaken for several years [(1996 VI 305(b)]; still true.
1. Water Quality Standards to Support Drinking Water Use Attainment
The water quality standards do not support drinking water use attainment. As shown in Table II.B.1, the Water Pollution Control surface water monitoring program tests solely for the presence of total coliform bacteria .
|
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations |
Water Quality Standards |
Support Drinking Water use attainment |
|
Organic compounds: |
Standards not available |
No |
|
Inorganic compounds |
Standards not available |
No |
|
Unregulated Chemicals |
Standards not available |
No |
|
Radiological contaminants |
Standards not available |
No |
|
Microbiological contaminants |
Class A-O/100ml |
Yes |
Since most drinking water supply comes from the Virgin Islands reverse osmosis and flash desalinization plants or from traditional rainwater cisterns (still required for all new construction) most national drinking water issues directed at surface or groundwater resources are moot in the Virgin Islands. The reason these standards are not developed in the US Virgin Islands is that drinking water is generally derived from cisterns holding rainwater at each house, or supplemented for public housing and in droughts and other emergencies by desalinization of sea water, as a co-generation by-product of the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority. The Water and Power Authority in St. Croix maintain some public water supply wells.
No surface water is used directly for any drinking water supply, although questions have been raised about whether sea water intakes of contaminated water is capable of passing bacteria contamination through the relatively low temperature (60° C) flash desalinization processes used for most public desalinization..
Under the provisions of the Territorial Pollution Control Act of 1972 (Title 12, Chapter 7, Virgin Islands Code), the Virgin Islands Water Pollution Control (WPC) Program is mandated to conserve, protect, preserve, and improve the quality of water for public use, and for the propagation of wildlife, fish and aquatic life in the Virgin Islands. This includes the assurance that all projects are in compliance with the Water Quality Standards as set forth in the VI Environmental Laws and Regulations (specifically, Virgin Islands Code, Title 12, Chapter 7, § 184, as interpreted below).
The role of the WPC Program is to facilitate the preservation and—where necessary—make improvements to water quality conditions so as to ensure that water quality standards are met; to monitor health; and to ensure that permitted discharges to waters of the VI meet effluent limitations. The DPNR/DEP is charged with the task of implementing and enforcing these provisions.
The WPC comprises two programs.
The Ambient Monitoring Program involves the collection of water samples to comprehensively evaluate coastal water quality. The Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR), Division of Environmental Protection (DEP), conducts the sampling with cooperation from the Division of Environmental Enforcement (DEE) and Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW).
Under the Water Pollution Control Grant (pursuant to Clean Water Act (CWA) §106), the Division of Environmental Protection has been entrusted with the task of monitoring the marine waters of the USVI and controlling discharges to those waters. The Ambient Monitoring Program involves the collection of samples which will give scientific data regarding water quality, and the TPDES Program which involves the permitting of wastes to be discharged Into the waters of the Virgin Islands. Permitted effluents, however, must meet the Water Quality Criteria as set forth in the Virgin Islands Code. Both programs work in conjunction with one another to preserve the quality of the ambient marine waters for the people of the Virgin Islands. The water quality standards are to be reviewed and, if necessary, updated every three years to preserve the designated uses by including more criteria with which to monitor. Due to limited staffing this task has not been accomplished for many years.
The Division of Environmental Protection is expected to be trained in the STORET program for local management of STORET data in August, 1999.
Evaluation criteria are a comparison of the collected data with applicable VIR&R Water Quality Standards and consultation with Departmental program managers regarding other elements of professional experience and judgment.
1. Point Source Control Program
The TPDES program or Point Source Control program determines who is allowed to discharge and at what concentration from a specific facility into the waters of the Virgin Islands. Title 12, Chapter 7 §184-11 of the Virgin Islands Rules and Regulations states, "no person shall discharge (means the addition of any pollution) to Virgin Islands waters from any point source."
A TPDES permit requires that all point source discharges of pollution be monitored by the permittee (facility), and the results submitted to DPNR/DEP and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). DPNR/DEP conducts compliance inspections and compliance monitoring on all facilities that possesses a TPDES permit annually to ensure compliance. If a facility is found not to be in compliance with the TPDES permit, enforcement actions will be taken against the facility in the form of fines. The facility must demonstrate to the Department how it intends to come into compliance by the submittal of a corrective action plan.
Unfortunately, not all permitted facilities are in compliance with their TPDES permit. The Department of Public Works (DPW) continues to be a major violator of its permit. DPNR has issued numerous notices of violations during this reporting period; however, corrective actions have not been made. Until there are major changes in maintenance and equipment at DPW, which are severely constrained by the on-going Virgin Islands Government budget crisis, their TPDES permit will continue to be violated.
The VI Water and Power Authority (VIWAPA) Electric Generating Facility continues to be the only permitted facility allowed to discharge toxic compounds and heavy metals, below EPA established Maximum Contaminant Loads (MCLs), into the waters of the VI. Compounds and heavy metals include Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCBs), Aluminum (Al) Copper (Cu), and Iron (Fe). In addition, the Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation (HOVIC) permitted discharge consist of the following compounds: Sulfide (S), total Chromium (Cr), and Phenols.
The point source program has developed a protocol for periods of noncompliance by the Department of Public Works. This entails the episodic monitoring of impacted coastal areas. This monitoring determines the level of bacteriological contamination in impacted areas, identifies trends (such as fish kills) and alerts the public of contaminated beaches based on sewage discharges.
Regulated discharges and discharge sites include sewage treatment plant outfalls (both public and private facilities), brine discharges from reverse osmosis (and other technology) freshwater production plants, industrial facility process water discharges, and industrial facility drainage discharge.
Unfortunately, many of the regulated facilities are not in full compliance with the provisions described in their respective permits, with site inspections of these facilities and reports of unpermitted discharges indicating that the water bodies near such facilities are constantly impacted. For example, the Virgin Islands Department of Public Works (DPW) is a major violator of its permit primarily because of a poorly designed and failing sewerage system in St. Croix that permits raw sewage to flow directly into the Caribbean Sea. Fish kills at ecologically sensitive wetlands have occurred repeatedly, and swimming beaches in the HOVIC/STX Alumina watershed have been closed on numerous occasions. Another example of a continual violator is the Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority (WAPA), where oil spills at its St. Croix facility (part of the Christiansted watershed) flow directly into the Caribbean Sea.
Major TPDES outfalls such as DPW and WAPA, are of concern because they are located in the same segment of the water body where water intake occurs for the major desalination units at Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. Refinery and WAPA-Richmond, respectively. There is also some concern that occasional pollution or turbidity at the WAPA sea water intakes allows the intake of large volumes of bacteria that may pass through the relatively low temperature (60 C) flash distillation units used for desalinization.
TPDES has several components, all under the auspices of the Division of Environmental Protection:
Permit Issuance:
Territorial TPDES permits are issued with limits pertinent to Federal and Local Regulations. Industrial permits are found primarily in the St. Croix district (Oil Refinery, Alumina Plant, and Rum Distillery). In each district the VI government operates publicly owned treatment works (POTW) and electric generating/ reverse osmosis (RO) water making plants (WAPA). There are numerous private and commercial RO plants throughout the territory that have TPDES permits. During this reporting period, twenty (20) TPDES permits were issued (or re-issued). Among these were 17 permits to Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corp. listed for the 1996 NPDES permits in the Permit Compliance System (PCS) system, and several other local permits such as the Esso station in Tutu, Texaco Tutu, St. Thomas Dairies, and Texaco Caribbean.